This is essentially a review from the article titled "Why Good Shots Miss" by David Petzal, in the February 2009, issue of the
Field and Stream Magazine, p. 24-25.
Overall, I think this is a good article, written for experienced shooters. One of the best parts is when Petzal explains that the state of mind has a definitive impact on the ability to hit or miss your target. He goes on to discuss that experienced shooters sometimes think too much, about too much information, that can cause one to "outsmart" themselves and miss their mark. However, in the final paragraph of the article, I think Petzal missed his mark. He writes:
"The difference between a good shot missing and a poor shot missing is this: A good shot will accept the fact that sometimes you're not going to hit and will banish a miss from his mind. Then he will resume hitting again. A poor shot will obsess about it. He will suffer from insomnia, weeping fits, incontinence, dandruff and the leaping fantods, and lose whatever shreds of confidence he might have had. And, of course, he will go on missing."
First off, I believe that while he's trying to sum up the article, and define the difference between a good shot and a poor shot with his witty remarks, he lost the focus of the article. Misses and bad shots happen to everyone, hopefully infrequently, but this paragraph suggest that goods shots just forget and move on. However, it also insinuates that poor shots (most of whom don't know that they are poor shots and don't care) need to banish thoughts of why something went wrong and, basically, just need to get over themselves.
The majority of the article dealt with hunting situations, so that's also how I am applying his final paragraph. All shooters, whether it be with firearms or a bow, need to not only recognize when they miss, but they need to dwell on the situation enough to fix it. While your life doesn't end because your shot wasn't perfectly placed, those types of misses, in the field, can result in injury or unnecessary suffering of an animal, instead of a direct kill. Instead of "banishing" the incident from the mind, enough contemplation is required to determine what went wrong and why, so that it doesn't happen again (even if it's a two second realization that you flinched and pulled to the right).
I don't want to debate Petzal's article because I don't necessarily disagree with him. However, I think Petzal summed up the difference as a black and white situation when it's anything but that. When you miss your target, do not dismiss it, contemplate it to fix it. But, don't go overboard on the contemplation either, because it is a fixable situation. From my experience, it's usually the bad shots that miss and move on. Good shots know how to diagnose and fix their mistakes. I believe the difference between good shots and poor shots is determination and discipline (practice makes perfect) and having the knowledge and willingness to continue to learn and grow as a shooter.